↓ Skip to main content

Skin Cancer Education for Primary Care Physicians: A Systematic Review of Published Evaluated Interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Skin Cancer Education for Primary Care Physicians: A Systematic Review of Published Evaluated Interventions
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11606-011-1692-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline M. Goulart, Elizabeth A. Quigley, Stephen Dusza, Sarah T. Jewell, Gwen Alexander, Maryam M. Asgari, Melody J. Eide, Suzanne W. Fletcher, Alan C. Geller, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, Martin A. Weinstock, Allan C. Halpern, INFORMED (INternet curriculum FOR Melanoma Early Detection) Group

Abstract

Early detection of melanoma may provide an opportunity to positively impact melanoma mortality. Numerous skin cancer educational interventions have been developed for primary care physicians (PCPs) to improve diagnostic accuracy. Standardized training is also a prerequisite for formal testing of melanoma screening in the primary care setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 89 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Librarian 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 24 26%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,406,676
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,998
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,656
of 111,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#23
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.