| Title |
Call for papers for special feature: “Evolutionary demography: the dynamic and broad intersection of ecology and evolution”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Ecology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10144-016-0555-0 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| France | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,925,943
of 23,650,645 outputs
Outputs from Population Ecology
#46
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,260
of 368,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,650,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them