You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis an under-recognised outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A narrative literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091490 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam G Culvenor, Jill L Cook, Natalie J Collins, Kay M Crossley |
| Abstract |
Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent disease capable of being a potent source of knee symptoms. Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction (ACLR) are well-established risk factors for the development of tibiofemoral joint OA, PFJ OA after ACL reconstruction has gone largely unrecognised. This is despite the high prevalence of anterior knee pain after ACLR, which can reduce the capacity for physical activity and quality of life. The susceptibility of the PFJ to degenerative change after ACLR may have implications for current rehabilitation strategies. This review summarises the evidence describing the prevalence of PFJ OA after ACLR and examines why this compartment may be at increased risk of early onset OA after ACLR. Strategies that address the modifiable factors for risk of PFJ OA may aid in alleviating joint loads and symptoms for people after ACLR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 35% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Estonia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 17% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 22% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 11% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 70 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2015.
All research outputs
#1,913,808
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2,659
of 6,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,928
of 181,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#30
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.