↓ Skip to main content

Tai Chi for osteopenic women: design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Tai Chi for osteopenic women: design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter M Wayne, Julie E Buring, Roger B Davis, Ellen M Connors, Paolo Bonato, Benjamin Patritti, Mary Fischer, Gloria Y Yeh, Calvin J Cohen, Danette Carroll, Douglas P Kiel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 83 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 11%
Sports and Recreations 31 11%
Psychology 16 6%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 98 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,359
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,459
of 4,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,070
of 94,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.