| Title |
Navigating abstract virtual environment: an eeg study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Neurodynamics, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11571-016-9395-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alireza Mahdizadeh Hakak, Joydeep Bhattacharya, Nimish Biloria, Roy de Kleijn, Fanak Shah-Mohammadi |
| Abstract |
Perceptions of different environments are different for different people. An abstract designed environment, with a degree of freedom from any visual reference in the physical world requests a completely different perception than a fully or semi-designed environment that has some correlation with the physical world. Maximal evidence on the manner in which the human brain is involved/operates in dealing with such novel perception comes from neuropsychology. Harnessing the tools and techniques involved in the domain of neuropsychology, the paper presents nee evidence on the role of pre-central gyrus in the perception of abstract spatial environments. In order to do so, the research team developed three different categories of designed environment with different characteristics: (1) Abstract environment, (2) Semi-designed environment, (3) Fully designed environment, as experimental sample environments. Perception of Fully-designed and semi-designed environments is almost the same, [maybe] since the brain can find a correlation between designed environments and already experienced physical world. In addition to this, the response to questionnaires accompanied with a list of buzzwords that have been provided after the experiments, also describe the characteristics of the chosen sample environments. Additionally, these results confirm the suitability of continuous electroencephalography (EEG) for studying Perception from the perspective of architectural environments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 15% |
| Psychology | 6 | 15% |
| Design | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,466,238
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#194
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,743
of 363,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.