↓ Skip to main content

The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, July 2011
DOI 10.1097/jcn.0b013e318213efcf
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christi Deaton, Erika Sivarajan Froelicher, Lai Har Wu, Camille Ho, Kawkab Shishani, Tiny Jaarsma

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) today is responsible for approximately one-third of deaths worldwide, and that figure will surely increase in both developing and developed countries as risk factors for the disease-primarily dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, physical inactivity, poor diet, and smoking-continue to increase. Although these risk factors are modifiable, to date there is a relative paucity of measures to prevent or control them, particularly in developing countries. A population strategy combined with a high-risk strategy for CVD prevention could greatly reduce the burden of disease in the coming decades. Many initiatives are working, but many more are needed. This chapter provides background on the global burden of CVD and provides the context for the subsequent chapters addressing nurses' roles in reversing the bleak predictions for the ravages of CVD if risk factors are left unchecked in the coming decades.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 106 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Engineering 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 39 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#359
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,042
of 127,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.