You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Valuing the Extended Role of Prescribing Pharmacist in General Practice: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Gerard, Michela Tinelli, Sue Latter, Alison Blenkinsopp, Alesha Smith |
| Abstract |
To quantify patients' preferences for new pharmacist independent prescribing services in general practice for managing common existing long-term conditions compared with usual medical prescribing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 43% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,096,693
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#503
of 4,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,688
of 177,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.