↓ Skip to main content

Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with vitamin D-fortified foods to estimate Dietary Reference Values for vitamin D

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with vitamin D-fortified foods to estimate Dietary Reference Values for vitamin D
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, June 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00394-020-02298-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin D. Cashman, Mairead E. Kiely, Rikke Andersen, Ida M. Grønborg, Katja H. Madsen, Janna Nissen, Inge Tetens, Laura Tripkovic, Susan A. Lanham-New, Laura Toxqui, M. Pilar Vaquero, Ulrike Trautvetter, Gerhard Jahreis, Vikram V. Mistry, Bonny L. Specker, Jürgen Hower, Anette Knoll, Dennis Wagner, Reinhold Vieth, Inger Öhlund, Pia Karlsland Åkeson, Neil R. Brett, Hope A. Weiler, Christian Ritz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,820,431
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#2,006
of 2,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,297
of 399,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#63
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.