↓ Skip to main content

Managing relapsed myeloma: The views of patients, nurses and doctors

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Oncology Nursing, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing relapsed myeloma: The views of patients, nurses and doctors
Published in
European Journal of Oncology Nursing, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.04.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Orlaith Cormican, Maura Dowling

Abstract

The study aim was to explore whether there were differing opinions on the current management of relapsed myeloma between patients and health care professionals, a topic which has never been explored previously in the literature. This qualitative study was undertaken at a regional specialist haematology centre in Ireland. Individual interviews were undertaken with multiple myeloma patients with relapsed disease (n = 8). Three focus groups were also undertaken with haematology nurse specialists, haematology doctors and staff nurses working in a haematology day unit (n = 17). The analysis of interview data was guided by thematic analysis. Two central themes were interpreted from the interview data: 'shared decision making with the expert patient' and 'an unpredictable disease journey'. Patients felt well informed regarding their illness but faced difficult decisions at times. Nurses and doctors stressed the importance of the early introduction of palliative care but acknowledged difficulties due to myeloma being unpredictable. Managing relapsed myeloma was fraught with complex issues. Patients developed alternative ways of coping with their disease including adopting the role of the 'expert patient', continuing to battle their disease and living with a chronic illness. Health care professionals struggle to manage the realities of a disease where the prognosis is improving. Uncertainty around patients' care and difficulties such as when 'enough is enough', continue to cause challenges. The transition to a chronic disease offers hope to patients and an opportunity for health care professionals to implement holistic care plans encouraging patients to be self proactive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Psychology 12 12%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Oncology Nursing
#742
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,747
of 323,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Oncology Nursing
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.