↓ Skip to main content

Review of Beet pseudoyellows virus genome structure built the consensus genome organization of cucumber strains and highlighted the unique feature of strawberry strain

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Genes, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Review of Beet pseudoyellows virus genome structure built the consensus genome organization of cucumber strains and highlighted the unique feature of strawberry strain
Published in
Virus Genes, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11262-016-1376-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Md. Shamim Akhter, Sachin Ashok Bhor, Ngcebo Hlalele, Masahiro Nao, Ken-Taro Sekine, Takashi Yaeno, Naoto Yamaoka, Masamichi Nishiguchi, Augustine Gubba, Kappei Kobayashi

Abstract

The complete nucleotide sequences of Beet pseudoyellows virus (BPYV)-MI (cucumber isolate; Matsuyama, Idai) genomic RNAs 1 and 2 were determined and compared with the previously sequenced Japanese cucumber strain (BPYV-JC) and a strawberry strain (BPYV-S). The RNA 2 of BPYV-MI showed 99 % nucleotide sequence identity with both BPYV-JC and -S having highly conserved eight ORFs. In contrast, the RNA1 of BPYV-MI showed sequence identities of 98 and 86 % with BPYV-JC and -S, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) coding sequences from three fully sequenced BPYV strains and five partially sequenced cucurbit-infecting BPYV strains from Japan and South Africa has shown that cucurbit-infecting strains are closer to each other than to BPYV-S. In addition, the strawberry strain BPYV-S has an ORF2 in the downstream of RdRp gene in RNA1, but all the cucumber strains, BPYV-JC, -MI, and those from South Africa, lacked the ORF2 of RNA1, highlighting the difference between common BPYV cucumber strains and a unique strawberry strain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Social Sciences 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,466,238
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Virus Genes
#684
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,794
of 365,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Genes
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.