↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of the water quality of a large urbanized river as defined by the European WFD: what is the optimal sampling frequency?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Estimation of the water quality of a large urbanized river as defined by the European WFD: what is the optimal sampling frequency?
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7109-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauriane Vilmin, Nicolas Flipo, Nicolas Escoffier, Alexis Groleau

Abstract

Assessment of the quality of freshwater bodies is essential to determine the impact of human activities on water resources. The water quality status is estimated by comparing indicators with standard thresholds. Indicators are usually statistical criteria that are calculated on discrete measurements of water quality variables. If the time step of the measured time series is not sufficient to fully capture the variable's variability, the deduced indicator may not reflect the system's functioning. The goal of the present work is to assess, through a hydro-biogeochemical modeling approach, the optimal sampling frequency for an accurate estimation of 6 water quality indicators defined by the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) in a large human-impacted river, which receives large urban effluents (the Seine River across the Paris urban area). The optimal frequency depends on the sampling location and on the monitored variable. For fast varying compounds that originate from urban effluents, such as PO[Formula: see text], NH[Formula: see text] and NO[Formula: see text], a sampling time step of one week or less is necessary. To be able to reflect the highly transient character of bloom events, chl a concentrations also require a short monitoring time step. On the contrary, for variables that exert high seasonal variability, as NO[Formula: see text] and O 2, monthly sampling can be sufficient for an accurate estimation of WFD indicators in locations far enough from major effluents. Integrative water quality variables, such as O 2, can be highly sensitive to hydrological conditions. It would therefore be relevant to assess the quality of water bodies at a seasonal scale rather than at annual or pluri-annual scales. This study points out the possibility to develop smarter monitoring systems by coupling both time adaptative automated monitoring networks and modeling tools used as spatio-temporal interpolators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,927,645
of 24,547,718 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,770
of 10,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,602
of 373,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#26
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,547,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.