You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
成人の甲状腺低リスク微小乳頭癌T1aN0M0に対する積極的経過観察の適応と方法:日本内分泌外科学会 甲状腺微小癌取扱い委員会による提言
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.11226/jaesjsts.37.4_289 |
| Authors |
日本内分泌外科学会 甲状腺微小癌取扱い委員会 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#62
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,992
of 526,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them