↓ Skip to main content

The challenges and opportunities in researching intimacy and sexuality in care homes accommodating older people: a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The challenges and opportunities in researching intimacy and sexuality in care homes accommodating older people: a feasibility study
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, August 2016
DOI 10.1111/jan.13080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Simpson, Christine Brown Wilson, Laura J.E. Brown, Tommy Dickinson, Maria Horne

Abstract

To explore the challenges of conducting research on sexuality and intimacy among older care home residents. Sexuality and intimacy are neglected in care policies and practices. Qualitative analytical study drawing on poststructuralist theorizing. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with residents and spouses (n=6) and care staff (n=16) in two care homes in Northwest England in 2014. The sample was obtained through a network of 'research-ready' care homes. Thematic analysis was used to make sense of narratives with the aid of NVivo10. Participant responses highlight the workings of ageist erotophobic discourse that undergirds the assumption of residents (and old people generally) as post-sexual. This materialized in reservations about the research ranging from opposition on moral grounds to doubts about its feasibility given the age-group concerned. However, residents and care home staff can also draw on counter-discourses that resist/challenge ageist erotophobic thinking, which materialized in methodological and ethical recommendations. Participants generally agreed with the principle of the research and made recommendations that could counter/resist ageist erotophobic governance and guide researchers on sampling, style of questioning and communicating with (prospective) study participants on a sensitive subject. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 23 17%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 40 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Psychology 12 9%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 43 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,265,230
of 24,803,011 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#504
of 5,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,211
of 344,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#17
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,803,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.