| Title |
Rediscovering the Arabian sand cat (Felis margarita harrisoni) after a gap of 10 years using camera traps in the Western Region of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-016-1035-8 |
| Authors |
Shakeel Ahmed, Rashid Al Zaabi, Pritpal Soorae, Junid N. Shah, Eissa Al Hammadi, Ricardo Pusey, Sheikha Al Dhaheri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 416 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 118 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| San Marino | 1 | <1% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 268 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 409 | 98% |
| Scientists | 4 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 310. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#112,004
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#3
of 1,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,309
of 381,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.