↓ Skip to main content

The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work

Overview of attention for article published in Educational technology research and development, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 1,085)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work
Published in
Educational technology research and development, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11423-016-9469-y
Authors

Sue Bennett, Shirley Agostinho, Lori Lockyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 208 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Master 26 12%
Lecturer 23 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 43 20%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 58 28%
Arts and Humanities 14 7%
Computer Science 12 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Design 10 5%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 60 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,585,948
of 24,649,404 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#31
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,931
of 372,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,649,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.