↓ Skip to main content

Application value of laboratory indexes in the differential diagnosis of Henoch–Schoenlein purpura

Overview of attention for article published in Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Application value of laboratory indexes in the differential diagnosis of Henoch–Schoenlein purpura
Published in
Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00393-016-0108-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

W.-X. Shao, Q. Ye, X.-J. Wang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the value of laboratory indexes in the differential diagnosis of Henoch-Schoenlein purpura (HSP). Patients with HSP hospitalized at the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2010 and December 2014 were enrolled in this prospective study. In addition, septic patients with rash and patients with urticaria, simple hematuria, and acute appendicitis hospitalized during the same period were selected at random as differential diagnosis subjects, and healthy children were selected as normal controls. The levels of IgA, D‑dimer, fibrinogen (FIB), and platelet (PLT) and the platelet distribution width (PDW) of these individuals were tested and analyzed, and the ROC curve was used to determine the applicability of these indexes to differentiate between patients with HSP and other diseases easily confused with HSP, as well as to determine the efficacy of combined diagnosis. There were remarkable differences in the levels of FIB, D‑dimer, IgA, PLT, and PDW among patients with HSP, sepsis patients with rash, patients with urticaria, simple hematuria, or acute appendicitis and healthy children (P < 0.01). The levels of IgA, D‑dimer, and PLT can be applied separately for the differential diagnosis of HSP, and these indexes and FIB can be combined appropriately to improve the diagnostic efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,240,961
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie
#204
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,354
of 364,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.