| Title |
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Data on CPM Outcomes and Risks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-016-5443-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judy C. Boughey, Deanna J. Attai, Steven L. Chen, Hiram S. Cody, Jill R. Dietz, Sheldon M. Feldman, Caprice C. Greenberg, Rena B. Kass, Jeffrey Landercasper, Valerie Lemaine, Fiona MacNeill, David H. Song, Alicia C. Staley, Lee G. Wilke, Shawna C. Willey, Katharine A. Yao, Julie A. Margenthaler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Georgia | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 32% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#445,777
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#37
of 7,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,858
of 381,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.