↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen isotopic analysis with a chromium‐packed reactor of organic compounds of relevance to ecological, archaeological, and forensic applications

Overview of attention for article published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogen isotopic analysis with a chromium‐packed reactor of organic compounds of relevance to ecological, archaeological, and forensic applications
Published in
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, July 2016
DOI 10.1002/rcm.7662
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda M Reynard, Noreen Tuross

Abstract

The δ(2) H values of some nitrogen-containing organic compounds measured by High-Temperature Conversion (HTC) with a glassy carbon reactor have been shown to be inaccurate. A probable explanation for these analytical inaccuracies is the formation of HCN, allowing some hydrogen atoms to escape isotope ratio measurement. We assess this isotopic effect in sample types commonly used for (paleo)ecological, environmental, archaeological, and forensic investigations. The δ(2) HVSMOW-SLAP values and mass fraction H using a factory-recommended glassy carbon HTC reactor packing were compared with those obtained from using two Cr-containing reactor packings for a variety of N-containing substances, including amino acids, collagen, hair, and silk. δ(2) HVSMOW-SLAP values and mass fraction H differed by reactor packing for most, but not all, N-containing samples. The δ(2) HVSMOW-SLAP difference was 10-11 ‰ for modern collagen and 12-14 ‰ for hair, demonstrating that reactor configuration is important for these proteins, and that the use of a chromium-packed reactor may be desirable. In contrast, Bombyx mori cocoon (silk) δ(2) HVSMOW-SLAP values did not differ with reactor type. In general, δ(2) HVSMOW-SLAP and mass fraction H differences by reactor packing increased with mass fraction nitrogen in the sample. With the Cr-packed reactor hydrogen mass fractions were at theoretically expected values, while the glassy carbon reactor produced lower yields of hydrogen. The protein and amino acid δ(2) HVSMOW-SLAP values measured by factory-recommended online HTC methods differ from those from Cr-containing reactor packing. The magnitude of the differences is variable with sample type; the molecular structure and diagenetic history of each sample may be important. Careful attention to this effect is therefore recommended for the δ(2) H measurement for all nitrogen-containing analytes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#3,002
of 4,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,197
of 379,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#18
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,966 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.