↓ Skip to main content

Understandingg in terms of information processing

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Understandingg in terms of information processing
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, September 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01417874
Authors

Arthur R. Jensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,486,175
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#386
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,235
of 18,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them