| Title |
Rates of rebleeding, thrombosis and mortality associated with resumption of anticoagulant therapy after anticoagulant-related bleeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.201433 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek H.W. Little, Rinku Sutradhar, Joshua O. Cerasuolo, Richard Perez, James Douketis, Anne Holbrook, J. Michael Paterson, Tara Gomes, Deborah M. Siegal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 15 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Malawi | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Saint Barthélemy | 1 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 65% |
| Scientists | 11 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#738,806
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,146
of 9,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,905
of 423,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#35
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.