You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Persistent slip rate discrepancies in the eastern California (USA) shear zone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1130/g37967.1 |
| Authors |
Eileen L. Evans, Wayne R. Thatcher, Fred F. Pollitz, Jessica R. Murray |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 63% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,067,735
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#698
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,342
of 363,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#41
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.