↓ Skip to main content

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as a Key Inducer of Angiogenesis in the Asthmatic Airways

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor as a Key Inducer of Angiogenesis in the Asthmatic Airways
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11882-012-0317-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norbert Meyer, Cezmi A. Akdis

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways characterized by structural airway changes, which are known as airway remodeling, including smooth muscle hypertrophy, goblet cell hyperplasia, subepithelial fibrosis, and angiogenesis. Vascular remodeling in asthmatic lungs results from increased angiogenesis, which is mainly mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF is a key regulator of blood vessel growth in the airways of asthma patients by promoting proliferation and differentiation of endothelial cells and inducing vascular leakage and permeability. In addition, VEGF induces allergic inflammation, enhances allergic sensitization, and has a role in Th2 type inflammatory responses. Specific inhibitors of VEGF and blockers of its receptors might be useful to control chronic airway inflammation and vascular remodeling, and might be a new therapeutic approach for chronic inflammatory airway disease like asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Other 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,249,293
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#269
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,425
of 175,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.