↓ Skip to main content

プロ野球ファンのロイヤルティ形成に関する因果モデルの構築 ― 広島東洋カープ,横浜DeNAベイスターズ,読売ジャイアンツの比較事例研究 ―

Overview of attention for article published in Japan Marketing Review, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
プロ野球ファンのロイヤルティ形成に関する因果モデルの構築 ― 広島東洋カープ,横浜DeNAベイスターズ,読売ジャイアンツの比較事例研究 ―
Published in
Japan Marketing Review, February 2021
DOI 10.7222/marketingreview.2021.001
Authors

田中 江里華

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,196,807
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from Japan Marketing Review
#7
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,717
of 451,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Marketing Review
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.