↓ Skip to main content

Chronic fatigue syndrome: is the biopsychosocial model responsible for patient dissatisfaction and harm?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
172 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic fatigue syndrome: is the biopsychosocial model responsible for patient dissatisfaction and harm?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x686473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith J Geraghty, Aneez Esmail

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 172 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Psychology 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#347,095
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#132
of 4,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,941
of 381,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.