↓ Skip to main content

Impairment of SOD1-G93A motility is linked to mitochondrial movement in axons of hippocampal neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pharmacal Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Impairment of SOD1-G93A motility is linked to mitochondrial movement in axons of hippocampal neurons
Published in
Archives of Pharmacal Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12272-016-0798-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Ryul Bae, Sung Hyun Kim

Abstract

Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) is a well-known antioxidant enzyme. Mutation of SOD1 is closely associated with the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. However, the pathologic pathways linking neurodegenerative diseases with mutation of SOD1 remain elusive. Here, we investigated the motility of SOD1-WT and -G93A (a pathogenic mutant of SOD1), and observed correlation of axonal transport of the mutant protein with mitochondria in primary cultured hippocampal neurons. The SOD1-G93A mutant showed significant accumulation at vGlut1-positive synaptic boutons and in cell bodies, compared to SOD1-WT. The proportions of motile WT and G93A proteins were similar (~30 %) while the motility velocity of SOD1-G93A was significantly slower (~40 %) than that of the WT counterpart. This motility defect of SOD1-G93A was highly correlated with mitochondrial movement. Our results collectively suggest that the SOD1-G93A mutant has a defect in motility that is linked to mitochondrial transport in axons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Psychology 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,830,116
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#65
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,883
of 365,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.