You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A GWAS meta-analysis suggests roles for xenobiotic metabolism and ion channel activity in the biology of stool frequency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soesma A Jankipersadsing, Fatemeh Hadizadeh, Marc Jan Bonder, Ettje F Tigchelaar, Patrick Deelen, Jingyuan Fu, Anna Andreasson, Lars Agreus, Susanna Walter, Cisca Wijmenga, Pirro Hysi, Mauro D'Amato, Alexandra Zhernakova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,969,959
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#1,189
of 6,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,120
of 367,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#18
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.