↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic diagnosis and medical prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis and its systemic manifestations: a consensus statement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Metabolic diagnosis and medical prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis and its systemic manifestations: a consensus statement
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40620-016-0329-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Gambaro, Emanuele Croppi, Fredric Coe, James Lingeman, Orson Moe, Elen Worcester, Noor Buchholz, David Bushinsky, Gary C. Curhan, Pietro Manuel Ferraro, Daniel Fuster, David S. Goldfarb, Ita Pfeferman Heilberg, Bernard Hess, John Lieske, Martino Marangella, Dawn Milliner, Glen M. Preminger, Jose’ Manuel Reis Santos, Khashayar Sakhaee, Kemal Sarica, Roswitha Siener, Pasquale Strazzullo, James C. Williams, The Consensus Conference Group

Abstract

Recently published guidelines on the medical management of renal stone disease did not address relevant topics in the field of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis, which are important also for clinical research. A steering committee identified 27 questions, which were proposed to a faculty of 44 experts in nephrolithiasis and allied fields. A systematic review of the literature was conducted and 5216 potentially relevant articles were selected; from these, 407 articles were deemed to provide useful scientific information. The Faculty, divided into working groups, analysed the relevant literature. Preliminary statements developed by each group were exhaustively discussed in plenary sessions and approved. Statements were developed to inform clinicians on the identification of secondary forms of calcium nephrolithiasis and systemic complications; on the definition of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis; on the use of urinary tests of crystallization and of surgical observations during stone treatment in the management of these patients; on the identification of patients warranting preventive measures; on the role of fluid and nutritional measures and of drugs to prevent recurrent episodes of stones; and finally, on the cooperation between the urologist and nephrologist in the renal stone patients. This document has addressed idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis from the perspective of a disease that can associate with systemic disorders, emphasizing the interplay needed between urologists and nephrologists. It is complementary to the American Urological Association and European Association of Urology guidelines. Future areas for research are identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 16 9%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 53 30%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 51 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,976,687
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#97
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,211
of 371,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.