↓ Skip to main content

ADHD and executive functioning deficits in OCD youths who hoard

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychiatric Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ADHD and executive functioning deficits in OCD youths who hoard
Published in
Journal of Psychiatric Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Park, Jack F. Samuels, Marco A. Grados, Mark A. Riddle, O. Joseph Bienvenu, Fernando S. Goes, Bernadette Cullen, Ying Wang, Janice Krasnow, Dennis L. Murphy, Steven A. Rasmussen, Nicole C. McLaughlin, John Piacentini, David L. Pauls, S. Evelyn Stewart, Yin-Yao Shugart, Brion Maher, Ann E. Pulver, James A. Knowles, Benjamin D. Greenberg, Abby J. Fyer, James T. McCracken, Gerald Nestadt, Daniel A. Geller

Abstract

Hoarding is common among youth with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), with up to 26% of OCD youth exhibiting hoarding symptoms. Recent evidence from adult hoarding and OCD cohorts suggests that hoarding symptoms are associated with executive functioning deficits similar to those observed in subjects with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, while hoarding behavior often onsets during childhood, there is little information about executive function deficits and ADHD in affected children and adolescents. The study sample included 431 youths (ages 6-17 years) diagnosed with OCD who participated in the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study and the OCD Collaborative Genetics Association Study and completed a series of clinician-administered and parent report assessments, including diagnostic interviews and measures of executive functioning (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning; BRIEF) and hoarding severity (Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview; HRS-I). 113 youths (26%) had clinically significant levels of hoarding compulsions. Youths with and without hoarding differed significantly on most executive functioning subdomains and composite indices as measured by the parent-rated BRIEF. Groups did not differ in the frequency of full DSM-IV ADHD diagnoses; however, the hoarding group had significantly greater number of inattention and hyperactivity symptoms compared to the non-hoarding group. In multivariate models, we found that overall BRIEF scores were related to hoarding severity, adjusting for age, gender and ADHD symptoms. These findings suggest an association between hoarding and executive functioning deficits in youths with OCD, and assessing executive functioning may be important for investigating the etiology and treatment of children and adolescents with hoarding and OCD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 41 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 40 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,963,173
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#2,256
of 3,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,822
of 381,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#30
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.