You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
3D Cranial Nerve Imaging, a Novel MR Neurography Technique Using Black-Blood STIR TSE with a Pseudo Steady-State Sweep and Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium Pulse for the Visualization of the Extraforaminal Cranial Nerve Branches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a6904 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F Van der Cruyssen, T-M Croonenborghs, R Hermans, R Jacobs, J Casselman |
| Abstract |
This study investigated the feasibility of a 3D black-blood STIR TSE sequence with a pseudo steady-state sweep and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium pulse for extraforaminal cranial nerve imaging on a 3T system. Assessments of healthy volunteers showed near-perfect agreement in nerve visualization with excellent to good visualization of the extraforaminal trigeminal, greater occipital, and facial nerves. Suppression of surrounding tissues was excellent to good. 3D cranial nerve imaging can produce nerve selective imaging of extraforaminal cranial and spinal nerve branches. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 22% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Serbia | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 36% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
| Engineering | 5 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,597,460
of 24,696,958 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#206
of 5,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,210
of 485,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#7
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,696,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.