↓ Skip to main content

Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Glycine max and Comparative Analyses with other Legume Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Glycine max and Comparative Analyses with other Legume Genomes
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11103-005-8882-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Saski, Seung-Bum Lee, Henry Daniell, Todd C. Wood, Jeffrey Tomkins, Hyi-Gyung Kim, Robert K. Jansen

Abstract

Lack of complete chloroplast genome sequences is still one of the major limitations to extending chloroplast genetic engineering technology to useful crops. Therefore, we sequenced the soybean chloroplast genome and compared it to the other completely sequenced legumes, Lotus and Medicago. The chloroplast genome of Glycine is 152,218 basepairs (bp) in length, including a pair of inverted repeats of 25,574 bp of identical sequence separated by a small single copy region of 17,895 bp and a large single copy region of 83,175 bp. The genome contains 111 unique genes, and 19 of these are duplicated in the inverted repeat (IR). Comparisons of Glycine, Lotus and Medicago confirm the organization of legume chloroplast genomes based on previous studies. Gene content of the three legumes is nearly identical. The rpl22 gene is missing from all three legumes, and Medicago is missing rps16 and one copy of the IR. Gene order in Glycine, Lotus, and Medicago differs from the usual gene order for angiosperm chloroplast genomes by the presence of a single, large inversion of 51 kilobases (kb). Detailed analyses of repeated sequences indicate that many of the Glycine repeats that are located in the intergenic spacer regions and introns occur in the same location in the other legumes and in Arabidopsis, suggesting that they may play some functional role. The presence of small repeats of psbA and rbcL in legumes that have lost one copy of the IR indicate that this loss has only occurred once during the evolutionary history of legumes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 138 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 22%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,496,406
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#420
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,285
of 71,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.