You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Usability of electronic health record systems in UK EDs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emergency Medicine Journal, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1136/emermed-2020-210401 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin Michael Bloom, Jason Pott, Stephen Thomas, David Ramon Gaunt, Thomas C Hughes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 231 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 120 | 52% |
Australia | 8 | 3% |
United States | 7 | 3% |
Canada | 5 | 2% |
Ireland | 4 | 2% |
Spain | 4 | 2% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Unknown | 68 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 151 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 57 | 25% |
Scientists | 22 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Researcher | 7 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 20% |
Unknown | 41 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
Computer Science | 12 | 11% |
Engineering | 8 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 43 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#221,012
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Journal
#19
of 4,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,727
of 454,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Journal
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.