↓ Skip to main content

Natural history of non-bullous impetigo: A systematic review of time to resolution or improvement without antibiotic treatment

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Natural history of non-bullous impetigo: A systematic review of time to resolution or improvement without antibiotic treatment
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
DOI 10.3399/bjgp20x714149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tammy C Hoffmann, Ruwani Peiris, Paul Glasziou, Gina Cleo, Chris Del Mar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#13,018,990
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,723
of 4,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,548
of 508,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#82
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.