↓ Skip to main content

Drosophila suzukii population response to environment and management strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pest Science, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Drosophila suzukii population response to environment and management strategies
Published in
Journal of Pest Science, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10340-016-0757-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nik G. Wiman, Daniel T. Dalton, Gianfranco Anfora, Antonio Biondi, Joanna C. Chiu, Kent M. Daane, Beverly Gerdeman, Angela Gottardello, Kelly A. Hamby, Rufus Isaacs, Alberto Grassi, Claudio Ioriatti, Jana C. Lee, Betsey Miller, M. Valerio Rossi Stacconi, Peter W. Shearer, Lynell Tanigoshi, Xingeng Wang, Vaughn M. Walton

Abstract

Drosophila suzukii causes economic damage to berry and stone fruit worldwide. Laboratory-generated datasets were standardized and combined on the basis of degree days (DD), using Gompertz and Cauchy curves for survival and reproduction. Eggs transitioned to larvae at 20.3 DD; larvae to pupae at 118.1 DD; and pupae to adults at 200 DD. All adults are expected to have died at 610 DD. Oviposition initiates at 210 DD and gradually increases to a maximum of 15 eggs per DD at 410 DD and subsequently decreases to zero at 610 DD. These data were used as the basis for a DD cohort-level population model. Laboratory survival under extreme temperatures when DD did not accumulate was described by a Gompertz curve based on calendar days. We determined that the initiation of the reproductive period of late dormant field-collected female D. suzukii ranged from 50 to 800 DD from January 1. This suggests that D. suzukii females can reproduce early in the season and are probably limited by availability of early host plants. Finally, we used the DD population model to examine hypothetical stage-specific mortality effects of IPM practices from insecticides and parasitoids at the field level. We found that adulticides applied during the early season will result in the largest comparative population decrease. It is clear from model outputs that parasitism levels comparable to those found in field studies may have a limited effect on population growth. Novel parasitoid guilds could therefore be improved and would be valuable for IPM of D. suzukii.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Master 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 38 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 48%
Environmental Science 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 48 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,901,936
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#372
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,861
of 301,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.