↓ Skip to main content

Structures, Algorithms and Stone/Timber Prototypes

Overview of attention for article published in Nexus Network Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Structures, Algorithms and Stone/Timber Prototypes
Published in
Nexus Network Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00004-016-0310-z
Authors

Micaela Colella

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 36%
Design 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,466,751
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Nexus Network Journal
#226
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,951
of 365,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nexus Network Journal
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.