↓ Skip to main content

Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Diabetic Pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Diabetic Pregnancy
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11892-012-0337-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niranjala M. Hewapathirana, Esther O’Sullivan, Helen R. Murphy

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with intermittent capillary glucose fingerstick tests is currently the universally accepted method of glucose monitoring in pregnancy. During pregnancy SMBG tests are recommended before and after meals and before bed (typically 7 values/d). Continuous glucose monitoring systems consist of a disposable subcutaneous glucose-sensing device, electrochemically measuring glucose levels in subcutaneous tissues every 10 seconds, providing an average interstitial glucose value every 5 minutes (typically 288 values/d). From a research perspective this provides unprecedented insights into the pathophysiology of glucose metabolism, while from a clinical perspective it can facilitate enhanced patient-professional decision making, patient motivation, and improved glycaemic control. CGM has thus been described as a "roadmap for effective self-management" and as a "stepping stone in the journey towards a cure." This review will consider the lessons learned and evidence supporting current and potential future use of CGM in the management of diabetes in pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Engineering 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,915,761
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#341
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,883
of 176,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.