↓ Skip to main content

Real-time dispersal of malaria vectors in rural Africa monitored with lidar

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time dispersal of malaria vectors in rural Africa monitored with lidar
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0247803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Jansson, Elin Malmqvist, Yeromin Mlacha, Rickard Ignell, Fredros Okumu, Gerry Killeen, Carsten Kirkeby, Mikkel Brydegaard

Abstract

Lack of tools for detailed, real-time observation of mosquito behavior with high spatio-temporal resolution limits progress towards improved malaria vector control. We deployed a high-resolution entomological lidar to monitor a half-kilometer static transect positioned over rice fields outside a Tanzanian village. A quarter of a million in situ insect observations were classified, and several insect taxa were identified based on their modulation signatures. We observed distinct range distributions of male and female mosquitoes in relation to the village periphery, and spatio-temporal behavioral features, such as swarming. Furthermore, we observed that the spatial distributions of males and females change independently of each other during the day, and were able to estimate the daily dispersal of mosquitoes towards and away from the village. The findings of this study demonstrate how lidar-based monitoring could dramatically improve our understanding of malaria vector ecology and control options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Engineering 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,914,076
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,439
of 198,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,403
of 420,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#495
of 2,888 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,888 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.