| Title |
Towards a natural classification of Botryosphaeriales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fungal Diversity, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13225-012-0207-4 |
| Authors |
Jian-Kui Liu, Rungtiwa Phookamsak, Mingkhuan Doilom, Saowanee Wikee, Yan-Mei Li, Hiran Ariyawansha, Saranyaphat Boonmee, Putarak Chomnunti, Dong-Qin Dai, Jayarama D. Bhat, Andrea I. Romero, Wen-Ying Zhuang, Jutamart Monkai, E. B. Gareth Jones, Ekachai Chukeatirote, Thida Win Ko Ko, Yong-Chang Zhao, Yong Wang, Kevin D. Hyde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#259
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,762
of 172,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.