You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Velocity-Based Movement Modeling for Individual and Population Level Inference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ephraim M. Hanks, Mevin B. Hooten, Devin S. Johnson, Jeremy T. Sterling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 19% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,722
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#131,326
of 195,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,611
of 121,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,530
of 2,368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.