↓ Skip to main content

EMG: Myths and Facts

Overview of attention for article published in HSS Journal®, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
EMG: Myths and Facts
Published in
HSS Journal®, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11420-005-0124-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Feinberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 45%
Engineering 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HSS Journal®
#304
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,971
of 175,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HSS Journal®
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.