| Title |
Assessment of extracellular dehydration using saliva osmolality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-013-2747-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brett R. Ely, Samuel N. Cheuvront, Robert W. Kenefick, Marissa G. Spitz, Kristen R. Heavens, Neil P. Walsh, Michael N. Sawka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 17% |
| Engineering | 6 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,328
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,373
of 224,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#18
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.