↓ Skip to main content

線維筋痛症と思われる疼痛を苦に自殺企図に至った1例

Overview of attention for article published in KANTO Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
線維筋痛症と思われる疼痛を苦に自殺企図に至った1例
Published in
KANTO Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, March 2020
DOI 10.24697/jaamkanto.41.2_267
Authors

久村 正樹, 百瀬 ゆずこ, 久野 慎一郎, 福島 憲治, 有馬 史人, 今本 俊郎, 大井 秀則, 重松 咲智子, 中村 元洋, 淺野 祥孝, 亀田 慎也, 橋本 昌幸, 安藤 陽児, 園田 健一郎, 輿水 健治

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,525,475
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from KANTO Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine
#9
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,399
of 383,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from KANTO Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.