↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of Sleep Disorders in Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 475)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of Sleep Disorders in Dementia
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11940-016-0424-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Ooms, Yo-El Ju

Abstract

Sleep and circadian disorders occur frequently in all types of dementia. Due to the multifactorial nature of sleep problems in dementia, we propose a structured approach to the evaluation and treatment of these patients. Primary sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea should be treated first. Comorbid conditions and medications that impact sleep should be optimally managed to minimize negative effects on sleep. Patients and caregivers should maintain good sleep hygiene, and social and physical activity should be encouraged during the daytime. Given the generally benign nature of bright light therapy and melatonin, these treatments should be tried first. Pharmacological treatments should be added cautiously, due to the risk of cognitive side effects, sedation, and falls in the demented and older population. Regardless of treatment modality, it is essential to follow patients with dementia and sleep disorders closely, with serial monitoring of individual response to treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Other 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 73 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 12%
Neuroscience 22 10%
Psychology 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 85 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,566,005
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#50
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,320
of 372,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.