| Title |
Schlafmangel und Insomnie
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00103-011-1378-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Riemann, C. Baglioni, K. Spiegelhalder |
| Abstract |
Lack of sleep and insomnia need to be viewed differently. Lack of sleep implies a shortening of the habitual sleep duration due to external circumstances or motivational factors. Insomnia, in contrast, is defined as a sleep disorder due to unknown reasons for the afflicted subjects. People with insomnia suffer from being unable to sleep, in spite of adequate external circumstances. Research on lack of sleep/shortened sleep duration has focused on relationships with somatic and mental health. Longitudinal studies revealed that a shortening of sleep duration (< 6 h) is associated with an increased risk for the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. For sleep duration and mortality, a U-shaped relationship was found, indicating that both shortened (< 6 h) and prolonged sleep durations (> 8 h) are associated with increased mortality. Similar, albeit weaker, correlations were described for insomnia and somatic health. In addition, insomnia is a risk factor for the development of mental disorders, especially depression. These relationships suggest that the area of sleep and sleep disorders should be integrated into everyday medical practice and that preventive approaches to somatic and mental disorders should encompass the topic of sleep to a much stronger extent than currently practiced. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 35% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 45% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,255,201
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#624
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,275
of 239,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.