↓ Skip to main content

A Sibling Death in the Family: Common and Consequential

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
A Sibling Death in the Family: Common and Consequential
Published in
Demography, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13524-012-0162-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Fletcher, Marsha Mailick, Jieun Song, Barbara Wolfe

Abstract

Although a large literature analyzes the determinants of child mortality and suggests policy and medical interventions aimed at its reduction, there is little existing analysis illuminating the consequences of child mortality for other family members. In particular, there is little evidence exploring the consequences of experiencing the death of a sibling on one's own development and transition to adulthood. This article examines the prevalence and consequences of experiencing a sibling death during one's childhood using two U.S. data sets. We show that even in a rich developed country, these experiences are quite common, affecting between 5 % and 8 % of the children with one or more siblings in our two data sets. We then show that these experiences are associated with important reductions in years of schooling as well as a broad range of adult socioeconomic outcomes. Our findings also suggest that sisters are far more affected than brothers and that the cause of death is an important factor in sibling effects. Overall, our findings point to important previously unexamined consequences of child mortality, adding to the societal costs associated with childhood mortality as well as suggesting additional benefits from policy and medical innovations aimed at curbing both such deaths and subsequent effects on family members.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 28%
Social Sciences 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 39 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#450,778
of 24,981,585 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#115
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,311
of 182,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,981,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.