| Title |
Factors associated with potentially missed acute deterioration in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0986 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Cecil, Alex Bottle, Azeem Majeed, Paul Aylin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 56% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 24% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,025,668
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#462
of 4,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,765
of 522,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#11
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.