You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly Entangled Quantum Computations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.91.147902 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guifré Vidal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Germany | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 705 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| Austria | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| China | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 2% |
| Unknown | 647 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 213 | 30% |
| Researcher | 129 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 100 | 14% |
| Unknown | 85 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 485 | 69% |
| Computer Science | 42 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 30 | 4% |
| Engineering | 20 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 3% |
| Unknown | 93 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,895,306
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#5,844
of 40,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,181
of 56,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#6
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.