↓ Skip to main content

Two-miRNA classifiers differentiate mutation-negative follicular thyroid carcinomas and follicular thyroid adenomas in fine needle aspirations with high specificity

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Two-miRNA classifiers differentiate mutation-negative follicular thyroid carcinomas and follicular thyroid adenomas in fine needle aspirations with high specificity
Published in
Endocrine, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12020-016-1021-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomasz Stokowy, Bartosz Wojtas, Barbara Jarzab, Knut Krohn, David Fredman, Henning Dralle, Thomas Musholt, Steffen Hauptmann, Dariusz Lange, László Hegedüs, Ralf Paschke, Markus Eszlinger

Abstract

Diagnosis of thyroid by fine needle aspiration is challenging for the "indeterminate" category and can be supported by molecular testing. We set out to identify miRNA markers that could be used in a diagnostic setting to improve the discrimination of mutation-negative indeterminate fine needle aspirations. miRNA high-throughput sequencing was performed for freshly frozen tissue samples of 19 RAS and PAX8/PPARG mutation-negative follicular thyroid carcinomas, and 23 RAS and PAX8/PPARG mutation-negative follicular adenomas. Differentially expressed miRNAs were validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in a set of 44 fine needle aspiration samples representing 24 follicular thyroid carcinomas and 20 follicular adenomas. Twenty-six miRNAs characterized by a significant differential expression between follicular thyroid carcinomas and follicular adenomas were identified. Nevertheless, since no single miRNA had satisfactory predictive power, classifiers comprising two differentially expressed miRNAs were designed with the aim to improve the classification. Six two-miRNA classifiers were established and quantitative polymerase chain reaction validated in fine needle aspiration samples. Four out of six classifiers were characterized by a high specificity (≥94 %). The best two-miRNA classifier (miR-484/miR-148b-3p) identified thyroid malignancy with a sensitivity of 89 % and a specificity of 87 %. The high-throughput sequencing allowed the identification of subtle differences in the miRNA expression profiles of follicular thyroid carcinomas and follicular adenomas. While none of the differentially expressed miRNAs could be used as a stand-alone malignancy marker, the validation results for two-miRNA classifiers in an independent set of fine needle aspirations are very promising. The ultimate evaluation of these classifiers for their capability of discriminating mutation-negative indeterminate fine needle aspirations will require the evaluation of a sufficiently large number of fine needle aspirations with histological confirmation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine
#1,584
of 1,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338,249
of 380,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.