| Title |
Enhancing self-management of multimorbidity in primary care: A randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x714185 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynn O’Toole, Deidre Connolly, Fiona Boland, Susan M Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 80% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,706,655
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#868
of 4,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,541
of 508,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#36
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.