↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Clear vs Standard Covered Masks on Communication With Patients During Surgical Clinic Encounters

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 5,858)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
65 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
250 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Clear vs Standard Covered Masks on Communication With Patients During Surgical Clinic Encounters
Published in
JAMA Surgery, April 2021
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian M. Kratzke, Marcy E. Rosenbaum, Chase Cox, David W. Ollila, Muneera R. Kapadia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 250 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 43 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Psychology 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 46 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 680. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#31,640
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#27
of 5,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,235
of 458,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#1
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.