↓ Skip to main content

Early Efficacy and Complications of Releasable Sutures for Trabeculectomy in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Glaucoma, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early Efficacy and Complications of Releasable Sutures for Trabeculectomy in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma
Published in
Journal of Glaucoma, March 2014
DOI 10.1097/ijg.0b013e31826981c9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan B. Liang, Mei Y. Feng, Hai L. Meng, Su J. Fan, Xing Wang, Li L. Xie, Peng Yi, Xin Tang, Ning L. Wang, Ravi Thomas

Abstract

To compare the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and incidence of early complications after trabeculectomy with releasable suture to standard trabeculectomy in Chinese patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 68%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Glaucoma
#1,649
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,032
of 236,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Glaucoma
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.